Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Mastering Grub 2 The Easy Way

Shedding commercial attitudes towards documentation

Will secret copyright treaty restrict your digital rights?

Saving the "Best" for Last - Fedora 12 (Constantine)

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS




UNIX System Administrator - SUN Solaris, Veritas, EMC, Shell Scripting, SAN (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:New York Law Journal: Obscure Law May Complicate Microsoft Appeal
New York Law Journal: Obscure Law May Complicate Microsoft Appeal
Nov 9, 1999, 17 :40 UTC (2 Talkback[s]) (6763 reads)

(Other stories by Karen Donovan)

"If the company [Microsoft] does appeal, a little known law called the Antitrust Expediting Act, which applies to antitrust actions brought by the U.S. government, will cause the defense some problems.

The Expediting Act will allow the Justice Department to seek immediate review at the U.S. Supreme Court, vaulting over sympathetic judges from the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., who ruled in Microsoft's favor in June 1998."

"...Microsoft faces an even greater problem from the Expediting Act. It precludes a party from appealing until a 'final judgment' is issued - in other words, until Judge Jackson has his say not only on the law's application to his findings of fact, but on what remedies should apply to Microsoft's antitrust violations. Microsoft would like to avoid that phase so that it can keep arguing the points of law in its favor without having to debate particular punishments."

Complete Story

Related stories:
CBSMarketWatch: Microsoft's a monopoly. Now what? (Nov 09, 1999)
Computer Currents: Microsoft Faces Challenges (Nov 09, 1999)
CNET News.com: Linux firms gain from Microsoft's loss (Nov 09, 1999)
Korea Times: MS Anti-Trust Battle Likely to Spark A Price Controversy (Nov 08, 1999)
SRO: Microsoft's Next Move: Let's Make a Deal (Nov 08, 1999)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
should be ny law journal, not ny times. ...   wrongly credited   
ll
Nov 9, 1999, 18:03:33
 
I think the Dept. of Justice should go f ...   DoJ should go for it   
Benjamin Scott
Nov 10, 1999, 02:30:21
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs