Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions

Kernel Log: Coming in 2.6.32 (Part 3) - Storage

TV Mythos Renewed: MythTV 0.22 with Many Improvements

Enhancing openSUSE 11.2: Adding Repositories and Packages

A Northwest Nobel option? (Linus for the Nobel Peace prize)

SECURITY: Cloud Computing Security Benefits, Risks and Recommendations

Keeping score in test-driven development with Python, PyLint, unittest, doctest,

Win a CodeWeavers Linux Gaming Rig




Sr Systems Engineer - Solaris - AIX (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:ZDTV: The Philosophy of Security
ZDTV: The Philosophy of Security
Dec 21, 1999, 01 :50 UTC (13 Talkback[s]) (5789 reads)

(Other stories by Simson L. Garfinkel)

[ Thanks to Jeremy Allison for this link. ]

"Windows and Unix take diverging approaches to computer security. Can both be right?."

"When discussing networks, people often want to know which is the most secure system. This is sometimes comes down to the fundamental question of the operating system. Is Windows NT a secure operating system? Is NT more secure than Unix? The answers to these questions depend a lot on your philosophy of computer security...."

"The Unix philosophy of computer security is fundamentally different. Instead of focusing on what is actually possible with today's tools and attacks, it focuses on what is theoretically possible given the underlying structure of the operating system. For example, instead of relying on complicated file-system structures to obscure the location of information on a computer's hard drive, Unix researchers created cryptographic file systems to protect data using data encryption. Microsoft designers could have used encryption to strengthen NT's ACLs, but they didn't."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
ZDNET UK: Microsoft doesn't trust open source because it raises security issues (Dec 03, 1999)
PC Week: Researchers warn about 'FunLove' virus [targets NT file security system] (Nov 12, 1999)
Linux.com.sg (Singapore): Linux and Network Security (Nov 12, 1999)
InfoWorld: OpenBSD comes close to security nirvana with a system that is 'secure by default' (Nov 08, 1999)
CNN: Don't blame Back Orifice for security problems (Sep 29, 1999)
IDG.net: Microsoft: Bad security, or bad press? (Sep 27, 1999)
SJ Mercury: Lessons from the latest Microsoft security flap (Sep 07, 1999)
Security Portal: Secure Linux Distributions (Sep 07, 1999)
CNET News.com: Hotmail hole raises larger security issues (Aug 31, 1999)
Network Computing: Unix Security: It Doesn't Have To Be So Insecure (Aug 24, 1999)
Slashdot: Obscurity as Security (Aug 17, 1999)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I have never seen someone summarize the  ...   excellent   
luser3483984
Dec 21, 1999, 02:26:12
 
Pointy-haired bosses prefer the Microsof ...   Windows is as secure as a doormat   
John Sowa
Dec 21, 1999, 02:42:07
 
*sigh*  It is generally accepted that Zi ...   ZD is so clueless   
Benjamin Scott
Dec 21, 1999, 03:49:04
 
It seems to me the most glaring problem  ...   MS security   
King Lee
Dec 21, 1999, 05:29:00
 
I'd gladly agree that the article is ...   Re: ZD is so clueless   
Ike To
Dec 21, 1999, 09:38:20
 
Have i get this right?:

1 - Micorosft W ...   Hum Two side Here ??   
Akoma
Dec 21, 1999, 15:05:54
 
First, the author said that Unix *resear ...   Re: ZD is so clueless   
Anonymous Coward
Dec 21, 1999, 15:15:08
 

	It's been acknowledged for quite s ...   NT security? Not.   
JCA
Dec 21, 1999, 15:51:47
 
To all those disparaging this piece as c ...   Re: ZD is so clueless   
Anonymous Coward
Dec 21, 1999, 17:00:01
 
Hold on a second guys -- the article may ...   Know who it is you are taking to the woodshed   
Jim Penny
Dec 21, 1999, 17:14:49
 
yeah right, my doormat at home have been ...   Re: Windows is as secure as a doormat   
Xunil Ung
Dec 21, 1999, 21:38:44
 
If security is a must then ACLs and User ...   Capabilities. Anyone?   
bgonzales
Dec 22, 1999, 01:11:45
 
Not just tcfs, but also PPDD and I think ...   Hmmm. Cryptographic FS are cool.   
philo vivero
Dec 22, 1999, 01:33:53
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs