Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

3 Easy ways to try out Linux

Amahi Linux Home Server 4.2

Matthias Ettrich Receives German Federal Cross of Merit

Using Windows Is Like...

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?




UNIX System Administrator - SUN Solaris, Veritas, EMC, Shell Scripting, SAN (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Silicon.com: Windows 2000 Special: Safe as houses?
Silicon.com: Windows 2000 Special: Safe as houses?
Feb 22, 2000, 20 :17 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (5820 reads)

(Other stories by Sally Watson)

"According to [RSA technical director Dominic] Storey, despite the added features, there are limitations in the OS which will become increasingly apparent - not least that the success of alternatives like Linux means it's unlikely to be an entirely Microsoft enterprise in the future."

"Perhaps the operating system's greatest weakness will be its size. Storey added: 'There's something like 30 to 60 million lines of code. Inevitably there are going to be some bugs and issues."

"Hyperion's Birch agreed: 'Anything that complicated has inherent security problems.' The point is echoed by Deri Jones, security services marketing manager at NTA Monitor. 'The first rule of security is that 'simple is best'. Anything that complicated is bound to have problems. 'There are some new features in Windows 2000, but not really enough,' Jones continued. 'Many of the extra features sound interesting and useful, but my gut feeling is that it will have a long list of security problems.' "

"So what advice can security managers take from all this speculation? The resounding viewpoint is one of wait and see."

Complete Story (free registration required)

Related stories: 
Silicon.com: Win2000: IT directors must look before they leap (Feb 22, 2000)
Silicon.com: Gartner stresses costs of Win2000 migration (Feb 21, 2000)
MSNBC/BugNet: Windows 2000's Active Directory not enforcing rights (Feb 20, 2000)
GartnerGroup: The Higher Licensing Cost of Upgrading to Windows 2000 (Feb 20, 2000)
InfoWorld: Windows 63,000: When does a bug become a point of collaboration? (Feb 19, 2000)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
broken in the Pentagon or similar comput ...   Yeah right! like nobody has...   
Xunil Ung
Feb 23, 2000, 00:35:25
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs