Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 










Current Newswire:

RIP Compiz

Thoughts about Kubuntu's Status, Canonical, and your distribution's sponsors

SECURITY: How To Set Up A TOR Middlebox Routing All VirtualBox Virtual Machine Traffic Over TOR

Sabayon Linux 8 Released

Running Simple Groupware On Nginx (LEMP) On Debian Squeeze/Ubuntu 11.10

Introducing Comice OS 4: Mac-Looking Linux

7 Best Free Alternative Git Clients

Python4Kids New Tutorial: Welcome back, Class Recap

Controlling Liquor Loss with Linux

Chrome Web Browser Finally Comes to Android Phones, Tablets



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Richard Stallman -- On the Microsoft Verdict
Richard Stallman -- On the Microsoft Verdict
Apr 6, 2000, 20 :53 UTC (31 Talkback[s]) (21568 reads)

(Other stories by Richard Stallman)

By Richard Stallman

Many GNU/Linux users think of the system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying.

Since Microsoft is just a part of the problem, its defeat in the anti-trust lawsuit is not necessarily a victory for free software. Whether the outcome of this suit helps free software and promotes users' freedom depends on the specific remedies imposed on Microsoft by the judge.

If the remedies are designed to enable other companies to compete in offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could lead them to do a "better" job, better in a narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to "compete" with them technically. We will continue to offer the user one thing those companies do not -- freedom -- and users who value freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, might be enticed away to "improved" proprietary systems.

Splitting Microsoft into separate companies could also endanger free software, because these smaller companies, no longer held in check by the public readiness to condemn Microsoft, might see fit to attack free software more harshly than the present unified Microsoft does.

I've proposed remedies for this case that would help free software compete with Microsoft: for example, requiring Microsoft to publish documentation for all interfaces, and to use patents only for defense, not for aggression. These remedies would block the use of the weapons that Microsoft plans to use against us (according to the "Halloween documents" leaked from within Microsoft which spelled out how they plan to impede development of the GNU/Linux system).

When we see what remedies the judge chooses, we will get an idea of whether the case has been helpful or harmful to the Free Software Movement.

Copyright 2000 Richard Stallman
Verbatim copying, distribution and display of this entire article are permitted in any medium provided this notice is preserved.


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Rather than regulate Microsoft, I think  ...   Another suggestion   
JJS
Apr 6, 2000, 22:26:43
 
I myself wouldn't mind having the go ...   Open File formats and API is enough   
Dara Parsavand
Apr 7, 2000, 00:05:52
 
Microsoft claims that they publish all t ...   M$ has no documentation   
John Sowa
Apr 7, 2000, 01:50:54
 
...follow military procurement rules (at ...   US goverment should just...   
Alessandro Coppo
Apr 7, 2000, 07:58:54
 
"For instance, by now word processing is ...   Rich Text Format   
Cathy James
Apr 7, 2000, 12:43:13
 
Except RTF is a Microsoft proprietary st ...   Re: Rich Text Format   
Anthony Youngman
Apr 7, 2000, 15:38:06
 
try saving all the different formatting  ...   Re: Rich Text Format   
aftrbrnr
Apr 7, 2000, 15:38:11
 
what's with RMS copyrighting his pap ...   *** NO SUBJECT ***   
aftrbrnr
Apr 7, 2000, 15:42:30
 
In the line below the copyright notice,  ...   aftrbrnr- GPL is copyright   
WdLvW
Apr 7, 2000, 16:33:59
 
Copyright has nothing to do with a redis ...   Re: Copyright   
Abreu
Apr 7, 2000, 16:39:31
 
Relating to what aftrbrnr said...

Basic ...   Re: Why not GPL his article?   
Anil Wang
Apr 7, 2000, 16:42:04
 
RMS makes some very good observations he ...   Competition cannot be supressed...   
Robert Wooldridge
Apr 7, 2000, 16:49:46
 
> what's with RMS copyrighting his p ...   Copyright Notice   
Thad Phetteplace
Apr 7, 2000, 17:10:06
 
There is a difference between copyrighti ...   to aftrbrnr   
J. J. Horner
Apr 7, 2000, 17:24:32
 
I seem to get from article that GNU/Linu ...   are you saying that GNU/Linux isn't good enoug   
jed bailey
Apr 7, 2000, 18:10:12
 
Anthony Youngman writes:
"My favourite e ...   Re: Re: Rich Text Format   
tc
Apr 7, 2000, 18:54:21
 
The saying "There is no such thing as a  ...   "Free Software"   
Scott
Apr 7, 2000, 19:25:48
 
You have to take what he's saying in ...   Re: are you saying that GNU/Linux isn't good e   
Anil Wang
Apr 7, 2000, 22:21:30
 
Free software in itself (as a group) doe ...   Re: are you saying that GNU/Linux isn't good e   
Peter H.
Apr 8, 2000, 00:01:39
 
Copyright doesn't have to be asserte ...   Copyright   
Doogie
Apr 8, 2000, 10:08:32
 
Open API => Too powerful wine would resu ...   Re: Wine might be bad; API; Formats   
szh
Apr 9, 2000, 20:47:33
 
Open APIs are good. OS/2 failed for a va ...   Re: Wine might be bad; API   
Anil Wang
Apr 9, 2000, 21:41:07
 
There is a word-processing standard form ...   Re: Another suggestion   
Chen Shapira
Apr 10, 2000, 17:06:29
 
But we don't compete on just technic ...   Re: Competition cannot be supressed...   
Chen Shapira
Apr 10, 2000, 17:09:32
 
As an old-time Windows and a Linux user, ...   Leave Microsoft Alone   
Greg Messer
Apr 13, 2000, 03:35:02
 
TeX is also standard, could be read and  ...   Re: Rich Text Format   

Apr 13, 2000, 10:21:06
 
Tex is definitely a better format than R ...   Re: Rich Text Format   
Anil Wang
Apr 13, 2000, 18:45:25
 
If Redhat and every other two bit Linux  ...   Competition? Who's competing?   
Sleepy
Apr 18, 2000, 19:51:20
 
As a current Linux developer (C++) and a ...   Wait a minute   
stumped
Apr 30, 2000, 19:01:39
 
The only problem I forsee when talking a ...   Freedom and inteligence   
Stuart
Apr 30, 2000, 21:38:16
 
A little overly optimistic, in fact.  Wh ...   Actually, RMS's solutions are rather optimisti   
RES
May 4, 2000, 02:45:25
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP