Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Power Up Linux GUI Apps

Ksplice debuts zero downtime service for Linux

BM Ups Its Processor Power to 7

KDE.org Relaunched for Software Compilation 4.4

The application is the new the operating system

Linux can compete with the iPad on price, but where’s the magic?

The Bruno Knaapen Technology Learning Center is Established

Anjal: GNOME's Evolution for Netbooks

Linux Mint 8 KDE Community Edition

Open source means freedom from 'anti-features'




UNIX Systems Administrator (IL)
Next Step Systems
US-IL-Chicago

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Windows 2000 'not ready for web servers'; Linux becoming most secure OS - Gartner
Windows 2000 'not ready for web servers'; Linux becoming most secure OS - Gartner
Nov 7, 2000, 14 :29 UTC (42 Talkback[s]) (27254 reads)

(Other stories by Jo Ticehurst)

By Jo Ticehurst, VNU Net

Windows 2000 is not secure enough to use on internet connected servers, according to a senior security analyst at Gartner.

John Pescatore said that companies should wait until the end of next year before running the operating system on web servers.

"I would not recommend Windows 2000 for internet connected web servers today," he warned. "The operating system has a major increase in security over Windows NT but it is still just out of the box. It has a lot of embedded components that are not sufficiently tested."

Pescatore explained that Microsoft's operating systems reach a state where security is "good enough", then drop again following the discovery of a new series of bugs contained in the next version.

"Windows 2000 will be more stable by the end of next year after a few more service packs have been released and the flow of what are relatively serious bugs is cleared up," he said.

"Most commercial versions of Unix, such as HP-UX and Sun Solaris, have reached a good enough level of security and are safe enough to use on the internet. If you have the skill set, then Unix is the safe choice today," he added.

Pescatore also claimed that "managed" Linux will become the most secure option in the next five years.

"There are two forms of Linux: one which is random, where the code is available on the web for all, [and one] which is managed, from companies such as Red Hat. Well managed open source testing can make software more secure, faster. By 2005, managed Linux will be the most secure operating system," he said.

Related Stories:
IT-Analysis: IBM surfs the Linux tidal wave; Linux surging in Germany(Oct 20, 2000)
Enterprise Linux Today: Linux suffers, but prospects look good - Gartner(Oct 17, 2000)
LinuxWorld.com.au: IDC forecasts strong growth for Linux(Oct 17, 2000)
EETimes: Synopsys views Linux, not Windows NT, as the emerging No. 2 chip design platform(Oct 10, 2000)
Enterprise Linux Today: IDC outlines server market trends(Sep 29, 2000)
TechRepublic/Gartner: OSDL seeks a faster track to Linux development(Sep 18, 2000)
Fairfax IT (Australia): Linux to top growth as NT keeps cash cow status - Salomon Smith Barney(Sep 13, 2000)
The Register: Microsoft won't fix new Windows security flaw(Sep 01, 2000)
Wired: It'll Be an Open-Source World(Aug 16, 2000)
InfoWorld.com: It's very clear Linux is here to stay, and five major trends are driving the OS(Aug 15, 2000)
The Register: Linux server growth threatens MS revenue supply(Jul 25, 2000)
The Times (UK): Inbuilt cracks in Windows' security(Jun 10, 2000)
WinInfo: Anatomy [of] a Windows 2000 bug: Microsoft knew about, ignored problem(Apr 08, 2000)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
"There are two forms of Linux: one which ...   Idiotic Statement   
Bryan Taylor
Nov 7, 2000, 14:58:06
 
"By 2005, managed Linux will be the most ...   Hmm   
Larry
Nov 7, 2000, 15:00:25
 
> Oh, and what about FreeBSD? It is ofte ...   Re: Idiotic Statement   
JFM
Nov 7, 2000, 15:44:55
 
To funny about Winbloze!!!  Unless there ...   BSD???   
PJ
Nov 7, 2000, 15:45:59
 
This is huge.  I know it's no news t ...   Dike is crumbling.. QUICKLY   
Tim Wasson
Nov 7, 2000, 15:46:47
 
> Oh, and what about FreeBSD? It is ofte ...   OpenBSD?   
MacroRodent
Nov 7, 2000, 15:48:05
 
That's the headline I would have lik ...   Windows 2000 Not Ready For Prime Time.   
General Tao
Nov 7, 2000, 15:54:14
 
> Oh, and what about FreeBSD? It is ofte ...   Re: Idiotic Statement   
Prana
Nov 7, 2000, 15:56:34
 
The people at Gartner have an institutio ...   What do you expect from them?   
Scott Knight
Nov 7, 2000, 16:01:41
 
What about OpenBSD, Solaris, AIX, *today ...   WTF? Linux?   
Shaman
Nov 7, 2000, 16:10:33
 
> "There are two forms of Linux: one whi ...   Re: Idiotic Statement   
PDL
Nov 7, 2000, 16:13:43
 
I think what is meant is, that RedHat pu ...   Re: Idiotic Statement   
Nero
Nov 7, 2000, 16:20:12
 
BSD has been around a long time and it h ...   Comments on BSD   
phil
Nov 7, 2000, 16:32:47
 
i luv it!! hahahahahahahahaaaa
i wonder ...   hahahahahahahahahahahaaaa   
yuri vil
Nov 7, 2000, 17:06:31
 
It appears that the event of people hack ...   Note the timing   
Keith Hankin
Nov 7, 2000, 17:11:06
 
Of course now that the Linux standards c ...   Bastille Redhat is very secure right now...   
Jimmy the Geek
Nov 7, 2000, 17:15:49
 
The press need to have a focal point. Li ...   Why Linux over xBSD   
JT
Nov 7, 2000, 17:20:31
 
Hey Genius!

'Managed Redhat'  ...   Re: Idiotic Statement - can you read, you idiot   
TheGrinch
Nov 7, 2000, 17:31:29
 
> To funny about Winbloze!!!  Unless the ...   Re: BSD???   
Bruce
Nov 7, 2000, 17:42:44
 
Poorly worded, but I think he meant to s ...   Re: Idiotic Statement   
brad
Nov 7, 2000, 18:01:59
 
You sound like the people who thought 5  ...   Re: Re: BSD???   
Jacek
Nov 7, 2000, 18:08:27
 
 Even Gartner (motto - "We love the stat ...   Re: Comments on BSD   
Art Cancro
Nov 7, 2000, 18:13:13
 
Is there any likelyhood of a link betwee ...   *** NO SUBJECT ***   
Alan Kitchen
Nov 7, 2000, 18:28:11
 
>>> Oh, please.  Proove it!  I'm so  ...   Re: Re: BSD???   
Joseph Nicholson
Nov 7, 2000, 18:56:33
 
The point he is making is that RedHat ma ...   Re: Idiotic Statement   
Joshua Drake
Nov 7, 2000, 18:57:58
 
Only one problem dogs OpenBSD or bsd in  ...   Re: Re: Re: BSD???   
ac
Nov 7, 2000, 19:01:15
 
I have also seen a lot of our IT people  ...   Corporate move to Linux   
Jesse
Nov 7, 2000, 19:42:58
 
Um, are we talking the same Red Hat here ...   Re: Re: Idiotic Statement - can you read, you idio   
jeff smith
Nov 7, 2000, 20:07:52
 
MMm well "managed linux" may be the next ...   "managed linux"? Debian rules   
fred jones
Nov 7, 2000, 20:53:00
 
When I speak of modifications not releas ...   Re: Re: Re: Idiotic Statement - can you read, you   
TheGrinch
Nov 7, 2000, 20:54:49
 

	Who are the idiots who pay for this c ...   The usual crap   
JCA
Nov 7, 2000, 20:58:56
 
> To funny about Winbloze!!!  Unless the ...   Re: BSD???   
Andrew Templin
Nov 7, 2000, 21:17:50
 
"'I would not recommend Windows 2000 ...   Always confused   
Tony OBryan
Nov 7, 2000, 22:20:33
 
   I would be curious to know how many p ...   BSD vs. Linux   
Steve
Nov 7, 2000, 23:25:47
 
Gartner seems to be saying that Windows2 ...   Re: Always confused   
CSD
Nov 7, 2000, 23:59:08
 
people hacking into MSFT and possibly se ...   Re: Note the timing   
tftp
Nov 8, 2000, 01:09:50
 
Amen! Linux vs. *BSD infighting is a was ...   Re: Re: Re: BSD???   
Zartan
Nov 8, 2000, 02:12:11
 
Custom compiled kernels by RedHat are no ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Idiotic Statement - can you read   
Walter van der Schee
Nov 8, 2000, 08:09:05
 
> > Oh, and what about FreeBSD? It is of ...   Re: Re: Idiotic Statement   
Earlneath
Nov 8, 2000, 09:12:54
 
> > To funny about Winbloze!!!  Unless t ...   Re: Re: BSD???   
JFM
Nov 8, 2000, 12:45:12
 
Can anyone point tot he original text of ...   Where is the full text of this report   
Don Drake
Nov 9, 2000, 19:33:50
 
I Dunno about secure but i installed lin ...   Linux with grubb boot loader   
curious
Nov 15, 2001, 04:07:48
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP


The Network for Technology Professionals

Search:

About Internet.com

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers