Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions

Kernel Log: Coming in 2.6.32 (Part 3) - Storage

TV Mythos Renewed: MythTV 0.22 with Many Improvements

Enhancing openSUSE 11.2: Adding Repositories and Packages

A Northwest Nobel option? (Linus for the Nobel Peace prize)

SECURITY: Cloud Computing Security Benefits, Risks and Recommendations

Keeping score in test-driven development with Python, PyLint, unittest, doctest,

Win a CodeWeavers Linux Gaming Rig




Sr Systems Engineer - Solaris - AIX (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Yahoo/CNET: IBM says Microsoft arrogant on open source
Yahoo/CNET: IBM says Microsoft arrogant on open source
Jul 5, 2001, 19 :00 UTC (40 Talkback[s]) (10621 reads)

(Other stories by CNET staff)

As you might predict, IBM comes out against Microsoft's stance on Open Source.

"IBM has called Microsoft's recent attacks on the open-source business model "arrogance," blasting them as futile and counterproductive...."

"Microsoft's comments have branded open source as anti-American and destructive to intellectual property, but IBM, which has recently become an outspoken proponent of open source, says Microsoft is swimming against the tide."

"'Microsoft is trying to shore up its defenses as the tide is coming in,' Adam Jollans, marketing manager for IBM Software for Linux (news - web sites) in the European region. 'They're trying to stop the tide, but the tide comes in whether you want it to or not.'"

Complete Story

Related Stories:
SiliconValley.com: A revolutionary pursuit: freedom from Microsoft(Jul 01, 2001)
The Industry Standard: Microsoft uses Open Source, Despite Critical Stance(Jun 28, 2001)
O'Reilly .NET DevCenter: Microsoft Plans Shared Source .NET(Jun 27, 2001)
The Register: Open Source Terror Stalks Microsoft Lawyers(Jun 26, 2001)
Microsoft SDK license disallows the use of "viral software"(Jun 20, 2001)
CNET: Bill Gates: GPL is "Pac-Man-Like"(Jun 20, 2001)
InfoWorld: MS masters NC mind-set(Jun 18, 2001)
UPDATED: MSNBC.com/Wall Street Journal: The campaign against Linux is uphill battle for Microsoft(Jun 14, 2001)
ZDNet: One agnostic's view on open source theology(Jun 06, 2001)
Eric S. Raymond: Microsoft and the Big Lie(Jun 01, 2001)
Microsoft Releases IPv6 WWW Server Under GNU License(May 25, 2001)
Eric S. Raymond: Microsoft's "Shared Source" plan -- such a deal! (May 18, 2001)
Microsoft: Microsoft Shared Source(May 17, 2001)
Microsoft's Craig Mundie responds to his critics(May 17, 2001)
eWeek: Microsoft clarifies exec's open-source concerns(Feb 21, 2001)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Yeah thanks IBM. ...   A big "thank you" to IBM   
AB
Jul 5, 2001, 20:59:45
 
Would someone explain to me why IBM is 
 ...   Seriously, explain it to me...   
anonymous
Jul 5, 2001, 22:22:01
 
well, just look at the sales numbers.
c ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
me
Jul 5, 2001, 22:48:18
 
> Would someone explain to me why IBM is ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
feldspar
Jul 5, 2001, 22:56:31
 
> As anyone whose has worked as a hardwa ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Kevin Reichert
Jul 5, 2001, 20:10:32
 
Plainly and simpley, IBM is engaged in c ...   Seriously, explain it to me...   
Ack
Jul 5, 2001, 20:12:53
 
> Would someone explain to me why IBM is ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
a.c.
Jul 5, 2001, 20:14:01
 
> well, just look at the sales numbers.
 ...   Re: Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
anonymous
Jul 5, 2001, 20:14:31
 
IBM is learning from its past mistakes.  ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Tony OBryan
Jul 5, 2001, 20:20:30
 
OK, let me try to explain it to you beca ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Peter Rasmussen
Jul 5, 2001, 20:27:09
 
> Would someone explain to me why IBM is ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Case Roole
Jul 5, 2001, 20:53:11
 

> I don't think that you are going ...   Re: Re: Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
me
Jul 5, 2001, 21:01:10
 
It is very simple really. IBM hasn't ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
SM
Jul 5, 2001, 21:08:17
 
> Would someone explain to me why IBM is ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Jul 5, 2001, 21:17:54
 
There are a lot of sound valid reasons f ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
phil
Jul 5, 2001, 21:24:01
 
"   I don't think that you are going ...   Re: anonymous   
Alastor
Jul 5, 2001, 21:29:56
 
IMHO IBM GPL friendliness in more an ill ...   IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freindly   
Nikolai Bezroukov
Jul 5, 2001, 22:39:22
 
Let's not forget one other possible  ...   Another reason   
Daniel
Jul 5, 2001, 22:58:18
 
I think hate is a rather strong word ... ...   Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freindly   
Jim Parker
Jul 5, 2001, 23:57:05
 
> [...] recently discovered GPL's le ...   Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freindly   
Ganesh Prasad
Jul 6, 2001, 00:29:05
 
> Also they are too big and powerful to  ...   Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freindly   
Svartalf
Jul 6, 2001, 00:43:52
 
> Would someone explain to me why IBM is ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
James
Jul 6, 2001, 00:54:45
 
i thought the new version of AIX was lin ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Rick Kreikebaum
Jul 6, 2001, 02:59:19
 
it's called "still pissed at MS abou ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Rick Kreikebaum
Jul 6, 2001, 03:32:12
 
> Would someone explain to me why IBM is ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
ac
Jul 6, 2001, 05:59:56
 
Whoaw, 

And you all believe IBM is tr ...   IBM and Open Source - very funny   
Xavalon
Jul 6, 2001, 08:55:20
 
> well, just look at the sales numbers.  ...   Re: Re: Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Wol
Jul 6, 2001, 09:02:55
 
IBM is a services company. The profit ma ...   IBM is a services company   
Richard Corfield
Jul 6, 2001, 09:06:14
 
IBM will release code under GPL, proprie ...   Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freindly   
Shiva
Jul 6, 2001, 11:21:14
 
If IBM was so evil, then how come there  ...   Re: Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Jurgen Defurne
Jul 6, 2001, 11:22:41
 
> The combinations of resources between  ...   Re: Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Justin Goldberg
Jul 6, 2001, 13:17:19
 
My opinion about GPL changed after RMS K ...   Re: Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freind   
Nikolai Bezroukov
Jul 6, 2001, 13:38:49
 
And you all believe IBM is trowing 1 bil ...   Re: IBM and Open Source - very funny   
WillTell
Jul 6, 2001, 14:50:36
 
> My opinion about GPL changed after RMS ...   Re: Re: Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux fr   
Anymouse
Jul 6, 2001, 17:55:17
 
> And you all believe IBM is trowing 1 b ...   Re: IBM and Open Source - very funny   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)q
Jul 6, 2001, 17:57:16
 
> There WAS no RMS/KDE jihad.
Hmmm.  I  ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linu   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Jul 6, 2001, 18:48:49
 
I think IBM knows what it takes to write ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
Mario Miyojim
Jul 6, 2001, 21:24:34
 
> Also they are too big and powerful to  ...   Re: IBM is not GPL-friendly, only Linux freindly   
Justin Goldberg
Jul 7, 2001, 00:24:02
 
> IBM is a services company. The profit  ...   Re: IBM is a services company   
alexd
Jul 7, 2001, 01:13:26
 
> Plainly and simpley, IBM is engaged in ...   Re: Seriously, explain it to me...   
T.
Jul 7, 2001, 15:20:18
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs