Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions

Kernel Log: Coming in 2.6.32 (Part 3) - Storage

TV Mythos Renewed: MythTV 0.22 with Many Improvements

Enhancing openSUSE 11.2: Adding Repositories and Packages

A Northwest Nobel option? (Linus for the Nobel Peace prize)

SECURITY: Cloud Computing Security Benefits, Risks and Recommendations

Keeping score in test-driven development with Python, PyLint, unittest, doctest,

Win a CodeWeavers Linux Gaming Rig




Sr Systems Engineer - Solaris - AIX (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:The Register: Web standards schism "terrible" - W3C patent policy boss
The Register: Web standards schism "terrible" - W3C patent policy boss
Oct 2, 2001, 20 :39 UTC (28 Talkback[s]) (10745 reads)

(Other stories by Andrew Orlowski)

"A web standards schism would be "a terrible thing", says the man at the centre of the firestorm over the blessing of royalty-bearing patents by the World Wide Web Consortium. Danny Weitzner is the head of the W3C's Patent Policy Working Group, and we caught up with him earlier today.

We raised the prospect of a breakaway after the ferocious reaction to the W3C's mooted RAND license. The suggestion that royalty-bearing licenses (RAND) should take their place alongside royalty-free licenses would make open source implementations difficult or impossible, say community luminaries. The public mailing list has drawn over a thousand critical comments since Saturday.

The nightmare scenario runs like this.

A company introduces a royalty-bearing technology under a RAND license, and it become a W3C-approved standard. The free software community decides not to pay the piper, and sets about creating a royalty-free and open alternative..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
W3C's Response to Public Comments on the Patent Policy(Oct 02, 2001)
CNET News: W3C Patent Plan Draws Protests(Oct 02, 2001)
Followups on the W3C Patent Policy from Richard Stallman, Eben Moglen, and Microsoft(Oct 01, 2001)
Alan Cox: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users(Sep 30, 2001)
Community: W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web (Sep 30, 2001)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Fine, let's split the Web up and see ...   Sign Me Up For The Schism   
Tim Sharpe
Oct 2, 2001, 21:05:24
 
Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory licens ...   Why RAND is bad.   
Reid Hekman
Oct 2, 2001, 21:19:48
 
I think that all too often that the worl ...   agree with the sign up.   
a.c.
Oct 2, 2001, 21:26:58
 
If alternative standards are created by  ...   Avoiding the ITU problem by writing alternative st   
Mark Kent
Oct 2, 2001, 21:44:05
 
"Number is one that overused word, ' ...   Convergence et. al.   
Tony OBryan
Oct 2, 2001, 21:57:36
 
If the overly broad type of patents as s ...   Overly Broad Patents   
deck
Oct 2, 2001, 22:26:42
 
The W3C committee said it has already be ...   Schism? Why wait?   
Jerry
Oct 2, 2001, 22:33:35
 
I think it's important to look at re ...   The reality of things   
Eric Laffoon
Oct 3, 2001, 00:01:09
 
There is a simple solution to Weizner&#3 ...   Turn the nightmare into a dream   
John Sowa
Oct 3, 2001, 00:24:05
 
 We are a small web publishing company w ...   Alternate Standard may be Necessary   
Brian Clancey
Oct 3, 2001, 00:40:24
 
> so they apparently were not waiting fo ...   Re: Schism? Why wait?   
R.L.
Oct 3, 2001, 03:53:54
 
"The free software community decides not ...   What planet is he from?   
jw
Oct 3, 2001, 04:21:28
 
The W3C is implementing "Reasonable and  ...   What does the W3C expect?   
Stefan Davis
Oct 3, 2001, 05:32:05
 
Please remember Canossa-part-II, in whic ...   Re: Re: Schism? Why wait?--apropos "schism   
R.L.
Oct 3, 2001, 07:04:06
 
> The strategy of the RANDers will be to ...   Re: Avoiding the ITU problem by writing alternativ   
R.L.
Oct 3, 2001, 12:58:20
 
I would be interested in donating money  ...   Donations For New W3C   
Tim Sharpe
Oct 3, 2001, 13:33:44
 
They can make the split necessary, or no ...   Their choice   
Charles Hixson
Oct 3, 2001, 15:09:23
 
worse yet, MS will see this as a way to  ...   Re: Why RAND is bad.   
Jeremy
Oct 3, 2001, 15:24:24
 
> I think it's important to look at  ...   Re: The reality of things   
Charles Hixson
Oct 3, 2001, 15:26:33
 
For the record let me state that I am ag ...   Did anyone read the proposal?   
JJS
Oct 3, 2001, 17:59:58
 
>>I think that where the OSS and Free So ...   Re: Did anyone read the proposal?   
Tim Sharpe
Oct 3, 2001, 21:21:15
 
> 
> There are companies such as IBM an ...   Re: Turn the nightmare into a dream   
Rufus Polson
Oct 3, 2001, 21:37:18
 
I'd like to air an extra issue about ...   RAND and national sovereignty   
Rufus Polson
Oct 3, 2001, 21:47:32
 
> if the European Union became disgruntl ...   Re: RAND and national sovereignty   
R.L.
Oct 4, 2001, 05:14:09
 
 
I agree about your comments about IBM ...   Re: Re: Turn the nightmare into a dream   
A Marlow
Oct 4, 2001, 07:43:00
 
> > if the European Union became disgrun ...   Re: Re: RAND and national sovereignty   
Rufus Polson
Oct 4, 2001, 17:01:37
 

> Example (one out of many): Poland, w ...   Re: Re: RAND and national sovereignty   
Jacek Piskozub
Oct 4, 2001, 17:12:41
 
Hi Jacek                                 ...   Re: Re: Re: RAND and national sovereignty   
R.L.
Oct 4, 2001, 18:45:02
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs