PC's with LinuxOS: are PC manufactures really that ready? | Linux Today

PC’s with LinuxOS: are PC manufactures really that ready?

Written By
Web Webster
Web Webster
Jun 10, 1999

Contributed by Linux Today reader Richard Kadoi

[ The opinions expressed by authors on Linux Today are their
own. They speak only for themselves and not for Linux Today. ] -lt
ed

In seeing the recent articles in the press about PC
manufacturers giving the buying public as an option for OS to be
Linux, I wanted to point out a few things from a Salesman’s
perpsective.

A little history before my bantor

First of all, as a end user of PC’s (of all types), I find that
my homebrew system running Linux has been wonderfully stable and
unstressful in keeping it going 24/7 without a hitch. As a
novice-to-intermediate Linux hack, I personally don’t mind
‘tweaking’ my system to work the way I want it to.

Unfortunately for me, it took me from starting with MS-DOS,
moving up to Windows 3.1, moving over to OS/2 Warp v3.0 before
realising that my system was being taxxed way too
much for the simple things I had been wanting to do since I retired
my Amiga 2000 back in 1994. I won’t get into the semantics of why I
still own an Amiga 2000, but let’s just say that nothing in the
IBM-PC world impressed me for a long time.

I started with a modest 486 and moved up to my current k6-233
w/64MB’s of RAM, gobs of storage and an pretty decent
video-card/monitor setup.

My main bantor

Now, I’ve been seriously in the market for another PC, something
easy to setup with a bit more horsepower under the hood. I want a
K6-2 or K6-3 chip machine, with at least 128MB’s of RAM and a
decent Motherboard/Videocard setup, and with a switch so I can use
my one monitor (17″) with both PC’s. Looking at several local
computer store ad’s and online ad’s, I’m finding that most systems,
especially the ones in the sub-USD$500 range are poor setups at
best.

Being a manufactures rep, representing the various companies I
do to the retail end, I find it very hard to swallow and even
believe that any combination of low-end parts to sell low-end PC’s
will benifit Linux in any way, shape or form. If companies are not
willing to test the vast variety of possible (virtually infinite)
combinations of hardware, a PC selling for under USD$500.00 would
not be a good thing for Linux. We already know it’s not a good
things at times for even Win98/NT.

Now, I know some of you are probably thinking “who cares, it’s
cheap, we’ll make Linux work anyway” must remember that these
companies are selling low-end PC’s (with Win98 installed) to John
Q. Public who doesn’t know a dime about how a PC’s innards work.
That’s why most vendors are selling Win98 machines at such low
prices, because they know that Mr. Public will go home, plug it in,
do his little MS-ditty and the PC will work. If something fatal or
non-fatal happens on a Wintel-box (or Mac), Mr. Public can call the
tech-support people at the manufacturers’ level and be helped by
the myriad of technical people that are affluent in Windows. If Mr.
Public were to buy from a vendor a Linux-box, if a fatal or
non-fatal system error occurs, would he be able to call on the
manufacturer at 2 A.M. and get the technical support he needs, or
will he be brought to his knees because that PC vendor may not yet
be technically Linux-ready (yes, I know, most major manufacturers
have announced installation of Linux OS onto their machines). My
concern is that are the manufacturers really ready for Mr. Public
to call with a minor problem, or even a major one, that can be
handled with a phone call?

As a Salesman, I certainly wouldn’t be willing to bundle Linux
with a low-end PC unless the manufacturer I represent has the
technical background to be able to handle a 2 A.M. call about a
video card making weird vertical or horizontal scan lines because
the end-user changed a video setting.

Oh wait, that already happens on Win-machines, nevermind.
*smiles* – let’s hope that same staff is up to speed with Linux in
it’s various incarnations.

(Richard is a manufacturer’s sales rep in the midwest, and
has programmed and dabbled in Apple’s, Amiga’s, and IBM-PC’s for
the past 18 years. His main love though is muscle cars from the
60’s, not CPU horsepower, in case anyone cared =)

Web Webster

Web Webster

Web Webster has more than 20 years of writing and editorial experience in the tech sector. He’s written and edited news, demand generation, user-focused, and thought leadership content for business software solutions, consumer tech, and Linux Today, he edits and writes for a portfolio of tech industry news and analysis websites including webopedia.com, and DatabaseJournal.com.

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.