Python-dev Summary, March 1 - 15, 2001 | Linux Today

Python-dev Summary, March 1 – 15, 2001

Written By
Web Webster
Web Webster
Mar 15, 2001

Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:28:48 +0000 (GMT)
From: Michael Hudson mwh21@cam.ac.uk
To: python-announce-list@python.org
Subject: python-dev summary, 2001-03-01 – 2001-03-15

This is a summary of traffic on the python-dev mailing list
between Mar 1 and Mar 14 (inclusive) 2001. It is intended to inform
the wider Python community of ongoing developments. To comment,
just post to python-list@python.org or comp.lang.python in the
usual way. Give your posting a meaningful subject line, and if it’s
about a PEP, include the PEP number (e.g. Subject: PEP 201 –
Lockstep iteration) All python-dev members are interested in seeing
ideas discussed by the community, so don’t hesitate to take a
stance on a PEP if you have an opinion.

This is the third python-dev summary written by Michael Hudson.
Previous summaries were written by Andrew Kuchling and can be found
at:

http://www.amk.ca/python/dev/

New summaries will appear at:

http://starship.python.net/crew/mwh/summaries/

and will continue to be archived at Andrew’s site.

Posting distribution (with apologies to mbm)

Number of articles in summary: 264

    50 |                                             ]|[
       |                                             ]|[
       |                                             ]|[
       |                                             ]|[
    40 | ]|[                                         ]|[
       | ]|[                                         ]|[
       | ]|[                                         ]|[
       | ]|[                                         ]|[ ]|[
    30 | ]|[                                         ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[                                         ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[                                         ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[                                         ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
    20 | ]|[                                         ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[ ]|[                                     ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[ ]|[                                     ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[ ]|[                                 ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
    10 | ]|[ ]|[ ]|[                             ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[ ]|[ ]|[     ]|[                     ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[ ]|[ ]|[     ]|[ ]|[                 ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
       | ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[     ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[ ]|[
     0 +-050-022-012-004-009-006-003-002-003-005-017-059-041-031
        Thu 01| Sat 03| Mon 05| Wed 07| Fri 09| Sun 11| Tue 13|
            Fri 02  Sun 04  Tue 06  Thu 08  Sat 10  Mon 12  Wed 14

A quiet fortnight on python-dev; the conference a week ago is
responsible for some of that, but also discussion has been
springing up on other mailing lists (including the types-sig,
doc-sig, python-iter and stackless lists, and those are just the
ones your author is subscribed to).

* Bug Fix Releases *

Aahz posted a proposal for a 2.0.1 release, fixing the bugs that
have been found in 2.0 but not adding the new features.


http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013389.html

Guido’s response was, essentially, “Good idea, but I don’t have
the time to put into it”, and that the wider community would have
to put in some of the donkey work if this is going to happen. Signs
so far are encouraging.

* Numerics *

Moshe Zadka posted three new PEP-drafts:


http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013435.html

which on discussion became four new PEPs, which are not yet
online (hint, hint).

The four titles are

Unifying Long Integers and Integers
Non-integer Division
Adding a Rational Type to Python
Adding a Rational Literal to Python

and they will appear fairly soon at

http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0237.html

http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0238.html

http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0239.html

http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0240.html

respectively.

Although pedantically falling slightly out of the remit of this
summary, I should mention Guido’s partial BDFL pronouncement:


http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013587.html

A new mailing list had been setup to discuss these issues:

http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-numerics

* Revive the types-sig? *

Paul Prescod has single-handedly kicked the types-sig into life
again.

http://mail.python.org/sigs/types-sig/

The discussion this time seems to be centered on interfaces and
how to use them effectively. You never know, we might get somewhere
this time!

* stackless *

Jeremy Hylton posted some comments on Gordon McMillan’s new
draft of the stackless PEP (PEP 219) and the stackless dev day
discussion at Spam 9.


http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-March/013494.html

The discussion has mostly focussed on technical issues; there
has been no comment on if or when the core Python will become
stackless.

* miscellanea *

There was some discussion on nested scopes, but mainly on
implementation issues. Thomas Wouters promised to sort out the
“continue in finally: clause” wart.

Cheers,
M.

Web Webster

Web Webster

Web Webster has more than 20 years of writing and editorial experience in the tech sector. He’s written and edited news, demand generation, user-focused, and thought leadership content for business software solutions, consumer tech, and Linux Today, he edits and writes for a portfolio of tech industry news and analysis websites including webopedia.com, and DatabaseJournal.com.

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.