Smart Partner: NT To Win2000: Worth The Pain? | Linux Today

Smart Partner: NT To Win2000: Worth The Pain?

Written By
SJV
Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Jul 1, 2000

“For some customers, the upgrade might be worthwhile.
According to our tests, W2K’s performance and stability are much
better than NT 4.0 with Service Pack 6a running on the identical
symmetric multiprocessing system. Server administration also is
greatly improved. And we’re impressed with Windows 2000 Pro on the
desktop, as well.”

“Unfortunately, W2K on the server is a mixed blessing. It
won’t run properly on many older, weaker servers, and there are
very few W2K certified apps. You also won’t get any performance
benefit from W2K on single-processor systems. Finally, the
operating system lacks comprehensive device support.”

“So should you migrate today? Should you try to persuade
customers and partners to do it? Our results provide insight into
what you may be up against if you opt to take the plunge.”

Complete
Story

SJV

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.