From the Judgement:
“Uniform Terms for Windows Operating System Products Licensed to
Covered OEMs. Microsoft shall license Windows Operating System
Products to Covered OEMs pursuant to uniform license agreements
with uniform terms and conditions and shall not employ market
development allowances or discounts in connection with Windows
Operating System Products. Without limiting the foregoing,
Microsoft shall charge each Covered OEM the applicable royalty for
Windows Operating System Products as set forth on a schedule, to be
established by Microsoft and published on a web site accessible to
plaintiffs and all Covered OEMs , that provides for uniform
royalties for Windows Operating System Products…”
“Disclosure of APIs, Communications Interfaces and Technical
Information. Microsoft shall disclose to ISVs, IHVs, and OEMs in a
Timely Manner, in whatever media Microsoft disseminates such
information to its own personnel, all APIs, Technical Information
and Communications Interfaces that Microsoft employs to
enable…“
“Ban on Contractual Tying. Microsoft shall not condition the
granting of a Windows Operating System Product license, or the
terms or administration of such license, on an OEM or other
licensee agreeing to license, promote, or distribute any other
Microsoft software product that Microsoft distributes separately
from the Windows Operating System Product in the retail channel or
through Internet access providers, Internet content providers, ISVs
or OEMs, whether or not for a separate or positive price….”
“Agreements Limiting Competition. Microsoft shall not offer,
agree to provide, or provide any consideration to any actual or
potential Platform Software competitor in exchange for such
competitor’s agreeing to refrain or refraining in whole or in part
from developing, licensing, promoting or distributing any Operating
System Product or Middleware Product competitive with any Windows
Operating System Product or Middleware Product….”