“Both sides in SCO v. IBM have filed motions for summary
judgment. To be precise, SCO has filed one for partial summary
judgment (which I’ll have up in a minute or two) and IBM has filed
several motions for summary judgment, one for each of SCO’s claims
and two more for good measure on two of IBM’s counterclaims. In
other words, it is asking the court to throw out SCO’s entire case,
and to grant it judgment on two counterclaims without even going to
trial on those two.“We find out because SCO has filed a notice of conventional
filing of exhibits to its partial summary judgment motion. It’s too
long to file electronically, so we’ll have to wait to read them,
but most of them we have already. And it’s obvious from the list of
exhibits what it’s about, namely what they likely feel is their
strongest claim, if not their only hope, their third cause of
action for breach of contract relating to Sequent…”