[ Thanks to Hallvor
Engen for this link. ]
“Feast your eyes on this, my friends! Judge Brooke Wells’ Order
Granting in Part IBM’s Motion to Limit SCO’s Claims. Finally, SCO’s
refusal to offer specificity has cost them, as it should. There is
almost nothing left in the case as far as the challenged items are
concerned. Items in dispute were numbers 3-112, 143-149, 165-182,
186-193, 232-271, and 279-293 on SCO’s list of allegedly misused
materials. That list was sealed, naturally, SCO being SCO, but
those are the numbers the judge lists. Footnote 65 (!) further
clarifies:“Initially, IBM sought to limit 201 of the 294 items identified
by SCO in its Final Disclosures. After further clarification by
SCO, SCO’s abandonment of one of the items (No. 294), and IBM’s
acknowledgment that it initially improperly included item no. 2,
198 items remain in dispute.