“Here it is, SCO’s Reply to Novell’s Response to SCO’s Motion
for a new trial or for the judge to just give them the
copyrights:“5/28/2010 – 875 – REPLY to Response to Motion re 874 MOTION for
New Trial filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) (Entered:
05/28/2010)“I know some of you wondered if SCO had given up and faced
reality and wasn’t going to file. Hah! Nevah happen. The full title
of the document is “SCO’s Reply Memorandum in Support of Its
Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the
Alternative, for a New Trial”. Wow. It’s like the good old days
with SCOfolk. Here’s why they say they need the copyrights:“Because ownership of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights is
required, at least, for SCO to enforce its rights against
third-party infringers and to pursue enforcement of claims
transferred to it under the APA, the jury’s verdict cannot
stand.”
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts