I can see the writer’s point here, I certainly don’t want Linux to be relegated to taking scraps from Microsoft’s table. That’s not a good way for it to be perceived.
However, I’m not sure that that would be the case if it replaced Windows XP on older machines. The writer cites Puppy Linux as a distro for those kinds of machines, but I don’t think that Puppy is really necessary. There are other minimalist distributions such as CrunchBang that might also work well.
LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.
