“The open-source movement argues that it’s better because ‘lots
of eyes can look at it and find the bugs.’ Those who favor
proprietary software offer two counterarguments: The first is that
a lot of hostile eyes can also look at open-source code–which,
they say, is likely to benefit attackers more than anyone else. The
second point is that a few expert eyes are better than several
random ones; a dedicated organization with responsibility for the
software is a better custodian than the many eyes of the
open-source community.“There is probably some truth to the notion that giving
programmers access to a piece of software doesn’t guarantee they
will study it carefully. But there is a group of programmers who
can be expected to care deeply: Those who either use the software
personally or work for an enterprise that depends on it….”
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts
Articles
View All Hover to load posts