IDG.net: Microsoft: Bad security, or bad press? | Linux Today

IDG.net: Microsoft: Bad security, or bad press?

Written By
Web Webster
Web Webster
Sep 27, 1999

[ This is a rewrite of the author’s story in InfoWorld–about
half of the content is new material–we believe all the
quotes below are from the new material. – LT ed. ]

“Microsoft Corporation has been getting a lot of bad press
lately over security vulnerabilities… But does this mean
Microsoft software is less secure than other software? A variety of
experts think so, claiming the software giant is offering more
functionality at the expense of security.”

” ‘It’s the dominant OS out there, so it’s going to attract the
attention. On the other hand, Windows has extremely sloppy
security,’ said Bruce Schneier, author of ‘Applied Cryptography’
and a founder and chief technology officer of Counterpane Internet
Security Inc., a provider of managed security services in
Minneapolis, Minnesota.”

What often upsets people is that Microsoft hasn’t learned from
the mistakes made in older operating systems, noted Jon McCown,
technical director of network security at the International
Computer Security Association (ICSA) Inc. in Reston, Virginia.
Categories of attack that are well understood are cropping up in
Windows, he added.”

“Windows is desktop software that ‘was never really intended as
network architecture,’ said Jeff Tarter, editor and publisher of
Softletter, based in Watertown, Massachusetts.”

” ‘Microsoft’s OS was never designed with security in mind,’
said Schneier. ‘For Microsoft, security is always an afterthought.’
One example is Microsoft’s implementation of file-sharing
networking services in Windows 95 and Windows 98… Microsoft made
TCP/IP file sharing the default on Windows 95 and 98 without
explaining the consequences of sharing files over the Internet to
users who weren’t savvy about network security…”

“Technical debates aside, most of the critics complained that
Microsoft often treats security issues like PR problems that need
to be averted and not resolved. … For instance, the company
downplayed the Jet/ODBC (open database connectivity) exploit in a
Microsoft Security Bulletin over a year ago so that ‘almost nobody’
bothered to install the patch and users were caught off-guard when
it made headlines recently…”


Complete Story

Web Webster

Web Webster

Web Webster has more than 20 years of writing and editorial experience in the tech sector. He’s written and edited news, demand generation, user-focused, and thought leadership content for business software solutions, consumer tech, and Linux Today, he edits and writes for a portfolio of tech industry news and analysis websites including webopedia.com, and DatabaseJournal.com.

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.