OSNews Asks: Who'd Be Responsible for a Linux Conficker? | Linux Today

OSNews Asks: Who’d Be Responsible for a Linux Conficker?

Written By
Web Webster
Web Webster
Apr 16, 2009

“A Linux distribution is made up of various components written
by lots of different projects. Those projects, in turn, are
comprised of lots of individuals who contribute code in a loose
manner. Microsoft Windows is also made up of various different
components, written by several different departments (“projects”,
if you will) within Microsoft. These projects, in turn, are also
comprised of several different people.

“If you can blame “Microsoft” for the Conficker worm, then who
do you blame when it comes to a Linux distribution?”


Complete Story

Web Webster

Web Webster

Web Webster has more than 20 years of writing and editorial experience in the tech sector. He’s written and edited news, demand generation, user-focused, and thought leadership content for business software solutions, consumer tech, and Linux Today, he edits and writes for a portfolio of tech industry news and analysis websites including webopedia.com, and DatabaseJournal.com.

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.