Security FUD In Action: Not Windows' Fault, Nope, Not at All | Linux Today

Security FUD In Action: Not Windows’ Fault, Nope, Not at All

Written By
CS
Carla Schroder
Apr 21, 2010

“The game of giving Microsoft a free pass on security flaws
continues, despite the rapid growth of the world wide botnet and
more Windows exploits roaming the planet than ever.

“‘100 potential attacks per second blocked in 2009’ fails to
mention Windows, though it names various individual malwares such
as Conficker, Hydraq, Sality.AE virus, the Brisv Trojan and the
SillyFDC worm. It doesn’t even use their full names: W32.Sality.AE,
W32.SillyFDC, W32.downadup (Conficker). W32 is “Windows
32-bit.”

“It fails to identify vulnerable “PDF viewers” as Adobe Reader,
and does not differentiate browser exploits by platform. The #1
unanswered security question from users is do Firefox exploits
affect non-Windows users? I have yet to get a good answer to
this.”

Complete
Story

CS

Carla Schroder

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.