[ Linux Today reader Case
Roole writes: ]
“Aside from its immediate legal significance, Microsoft’s
Revised
Findings of Fact is relevant because it presents a bottom line
of accepted claims that other Microsoft publications cannot
contradict without the possibility of serious legal
repercussions.
Claims in Microsoft’s “Linux
Myths” document contradict claims made in Microsoft’s Revised
Findings of Fact.
Wider knowledge of what Microsoft has claimed as being true in
court, will help those defending against wild allegations by
Microsoft and will ultimately help making Microsoft a more honest
company.
For this purpose I have extracted
all fragments from Microsoft’s Revised Findings of Fact containing
the word “Linux.”