“You know, when I first heard that Brent Hatch represented SCO
at the February 24, 2006 hearing in SCO v. IBM on whether or not
SCO would be permitted to depose Intel, Open Group and Oracle,
instead of Ted Normand, who usually speaks for SCO, I thought it
was because Ted Normand was too embarrassed to show up to explain
those famous defective subpoenas he sent out that were finally
served the night before the targets were supposed to show up,
documents in hand, at 9 the next morning, in one case saying to
show up in California and New York simultaneously and what not. The
mistakes, if that is what they were, were on such a scale a girl
could be forgiven for thinking that what SCO wanted was a delay,
not a deposition. SCO and discovery. They just can’t let go of
it…”
Web Webster has more than 20 years of writing and editorial experience in the tech sector. He’s written and edited news, demand generation, user-focused, and thought leadership content for business software solutions, consumer tech, and Linux Today, he edits and writes for a portfolio of tech industry news and analysis websites including webopedia.com, and DatabaseJournal.com.
LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.
Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.