Supreme Court to Decide Standard for Proving Invalidity of a Patent

Written By
Web Webster
Web Webster
Nov 30, 2010

“Today the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Microsoft’s appeal
in a case that could make it easier to invalidate a patent. If
successful, Microsoft’s challenge should help in the fight against
bad patents by leveling the playing field for showing that a patent
is invalid. A Microsoft win in the case would benefit not only
Microsoft, but also the free and open source software community.
That’s why EFF, joined by Public Knowledge, the Computer &
Communications Industry Association and the Apache Software
Foundation, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court supporting
Microsoft.

“As we previously reported, here’s some background: In court,
parties have to prove their case by some “standard of proof.” In
almost all civil cases, the standard is “preponderance of the
evidence” – meaning it is more likely than not that the facts
are true. When the question is invalidating a patent, however, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided that a
defendant trying to prove a patent invalid must do so by a higher
standard than normal civil cases, that of “clear and convincing”
evidence.”


Complete Story

Web Webster

Web Webster

Web Webster has more than 20 years of writing and editorial experience in the tech sector. He’s written and edited news, demand generation, user-focused, and thought leadership content for business software solutions, consumer tech, and Linux Today, he edits and writes for a portfolio of tech industry news and analysis websites including webopedia.com, and DatabaseJournal.com.

Linux Today Logo

LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.