[ Thanks to Steven J.
Vaughan-Nichols for this link. ]
“The only person who has written more about SCO than yours truly
is Pamela Jones of Groklaw. So, when PJ–a real, live person by the
way, lest any of you still have doubts–says that SCO is probably
not going to show any long promised proof that Unix code has been
ripped off and used in Linux this Friday, I agree with her.“Mind you, neither of us, nor much of anyone else outside the
Lindon, Utah town limits, believes that SCO has any such proof, but
that’s beside the point. In theory, SCO has to show its ‘Allegedly
Misused Material Identified to Date’ cards. In practice, I, like
Jones, expect SCO to find some way to delay the matter until, at
least, the next deadline: Dec. 22…”
LinuxToday is a trusted, contributor-driven news resource supporting all types of Linux users. Our thriving international community engages with us through social media and frequent content contributions aimed at solving problems ranging from personal computing to enterprise-level IT operations. LinuxToday serves as a home for a community that struggles to find comparable information elsewhere on the web.
Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.